FIRST LEGO League Challenge State Championship Grading Rubric February 27, 2021Uncategorizedsanchez FIRST LEGO League Challenge State Championship Grading Rubric For submission of judging rubrics for state tournament. Team Number and Name*Please select your team number and name from the drop down list.CHOOSE ONE1429 The Vectors2583 Dragoneer Robotics3732 Team Phoenix4043 Bayou Builders4249 St. Theresa Warrior Robots Seniors6801 Tigerbots8218 Fatima Warriors 18222 Fatima Warriors 210055 BRIS Falcons - Team AlphaZero19007 BetaBots19015 BetaDroids21146 Exploding Blue Jays Blue Team21237 BRIS Falcons - Team Beta Version24225 Beauty and Brains Robotics21343 Capitol Middle RoboCougars25379 Saints Robotics26595 Knights Robotics31229 RoboBucs31362 St. Theresa Warrior Robots JV33055 Trotter Bots33564 Braniacs34395 MakerWay 137701 Exploding Blue Jays Yellow Team37706 Soaring Robots38999 Coteau City Wolves40262 Down the Bayou Robotics42888 Coteau Wolf Master44379 Triton Stingrays44449 St. Catherine of Siena Gator Robotics45346 Bullion Bear Bots45593 Wolverobots46667 St. Theresa Warrior Robots Junior46895 Junior Tiger Bots46907 Pelican Bots50262 Tech Lords51125 Space Ninjas51320 Loranger Middle School Wolf-Bytes51730 1stBearBots51799 Triton Sharks52652 KST Tigers-152653 KST Tigers-252698 Atlas Tigers52851 #Elevate53009 Fab Jab League54266 Nunez RoboticsJudging Pod*CHOOSE ONE12345678Core ValuesThe Core Values should be the lens through which you watch the team’s presentations. All team members should demonstrate the Core Values in everything they do. This rubric should be used to record the Core Values observed thoughout the judging session. Core Values will also be evaluated at each Robot Game with Gracious Professionalism® scores, which will feed into a team’s overall Core Values rank.Rising All StarSelect "Yes" if you believe this team is a team that the judges notice and expect great things from in the future. CHOOSE ONEYesNo BEGINNING DEVELOPING ACCOMPLISHED EXCEEDS Minimally observed across the team Inconsistently observed across the team Consistently observed across the team 1 2 3 4 DISCOVERY*Team explored new skills and ideas. 1 2 3 4 DISCOVERY - Explain how team exceeds:* INNOVATION*Team used creativity and persistence to solve problems. 1 2 3 4 INNOVATION - Explain how team exceeds:* IMPACT*Team applied what they learned to improve their world. 1 2 3 4 IMPACT - Explain how team exceeds:* INCLUSION*Team demonstrated respect and embraced their differences. 1 2 3 4 INCLUSION - Explain how team exceeds:* TEAMWORK*Team clearly showed they had worked as a team throughout their journey. 1 2 3 4 TEAMWORK - Explain how team exceeds:* FUN*Teams clearly had fun and celebrated what they have achieved. 1 2 3 4 FUN - Explain how team exceeds:* Core Values Feedback Comments - Great Job:Core Values Comments - Think About:Innovation ProjectTeams should communicate to the judges their achievement in each of the following criteria. This rubric should be filled out during the Innovation Project presentation. Judges are required to tick one box on each separate line to indicate the level the team has achieved. If the team exceeds, please make a short comment in the Exceeds box. BEGINNING DEVELOPING ACCOMPLISHED EXCEEDS 1 2 3 4 IDENTIFY 1 - Project*Team had a clearly defined problem that it was well researched. 1 - Problem not clearly defined 2 - Partially clear definition of the problem 3 - Clear definition of the problem 4 IDENTIFY 1 - Project - How has the team exceeded?* IDENTIFY 2 - Project*Team had a clearly defined problem that it was well researched. 1 - Minimal research 2 - Partial research from more than one source 3 - Clear, detailed research from a variety of sources 4 IDENTIFY 2 - Project - How has the team exceeded?* DESIGN 1 - Project*Team generated innovative ideas independently before selecting and planning which one to develop. 1 - Minimal evidence of an inclusive selection process 2 - Partial evidence of an inclusive selection process 3 - Clear evidence of an inclusive selection process 4 DESIGN 1 - Project - How has the team exceeded?* DESIGN 2 - Project*Team generated innovative ideas independently before selecting and planning which one to develop. 1 - Minimal evidence of an effective plan 2 - Partial evidence of an effective plan 3 - Clear evidence of an effective plan 4 DESIGN 2 - Project - How has the team exceeded?* CREATE 1 - Project*Team developed an original idea or built on an existing one with a prototype model/drawing to represent their solution. 1 - Minimal development of innovative solution 2 - Partial development of innovative solution 3 - Clear development of innovative solution 4 CREATE 1 - Project - How has the team exceeded?* CREATE 2 - Project*Team developed an original idea or built on an existing one with a prototype model/drawing to represent their solution. 1 - Unclear model/drawing of solution 2 - Simple model/drawing that helps to share the solution 3 - Detailed model/drawing that helps to share the solution 4 CREATE 2 - Project - How has the team exceeded?* ITERATE 1 - Project*Team shared their ideas, collected feedback and included improvements in their solution. 1 - Minimal sharing of their solution 2 - Shared their solution with user OR professional 3 - Shared their solution with user AND professional 4 ITERATE 1 - Project - How has the team exceeded?* ITERATE 2 - Project*Team shared their ideas, collected feedback and included improvements in their solution. 1 - Minimal evidence of improvements intheir solution 2 - Partial evidence of improvements in their solution 3 - Clear evidence of improvements in their solution 4 ITERATE 2 - Project - How has the team exceeded?* COMMUNICATE 1 - Project*Team shared a creative and effective presentation of their current solution and its impact on their users. 1 - Presentation minimally engaging 2 - Presentation partially engaging 3 - Presentation engaging 4 COMMUNICATE 1 - Project - How has the team exceeded?* COMMUNICATE 2 - Project*Team shared a creative and effective presentation of their current solution and its impact on their users. 1 - Solution and its potential impact onothers unclear 2 - Solution and its potential impact onothers partially clear 3 - Solution and its potential impact onothers clear 4 COMMUNICATE 2 - Project - How has the team exceeded?* Project Feedback Comments - Great Job:Project Feedback Comments - Think About:Robot DesignTeams should communicate to the judges their achievement in each of the following criteria. This rubric should be filled out during the Robot Design explanation. Judges are required to tick one box on each separate line to indicate the level the team has achieved. If the team exceeds, please make a short comment in the Exceeds box. BEGINNING DEVELOPING ACCOMPLISHED EXCEEDS 1 2 3 4 IDENTIFY 1 - Robot Design*Team had a clearly defined mission strategy and explored building and coding skills they needed. 1 - Unclear mission strategy 2 - Partially clear mission strategy 3 - Clear mission strategy 4 IDENTIFY 1 - Robot Design - How has the team exceeded?* IDENTIFY 2 - Robot Design*Team had a clearly defined mission strategy and explored building and coding skills they needed. 1 - Limited evidence of building and coding skills in all team members 2 - Inconsistent evidence of building and coding skills in all team members 3 - Consistent evidence of building and coding skills in all team members 4 IDENTIFY 2 - Robot Design - How has the team exceeded?* DESIGN 1 - Robot Design*Team produced innovative designs and a clear workplan, seeking guidance as needed. 1 - Minimal evidence of an effective plan 2 - Partial evidence of an effective plan 3 - Clear evidence of an effective plan 4 DESIGN 1 - Robot Design - How has the team exceeded?* DESIGN 2 - Robot Design*Team produced innovative designs and a clear workplan, seeking guidance as needed. 1 - Minimal explanation of robot and code’s innovative features 2 - Partial explanation of robot and code’s innovative features 3 - Clear explanation of robot and code’s innovative features 4 DESIGN 2 - Robot Design - How has the team exceeded?* CREATE 1 - Robot Design*Team developed an effective robot and code solution matching their mission strategy. 1 - Limited explanation of their robot and its attachment and sensor functionality 2 - Simple explanation of their robot and its attachment and sensor functionality 3 - Detailed explanation of their robot and its attachment and sensor functionality 4 CREATE 1 - Robot Design - How has the team exceeded?* CREATE 2 - Robot Design*Team developed an effective robot and code solution matching their mission strategy. 1 - Unclear explanation of how code makes their robot act 2 - Partially clear explanation of how code makes their robot act 3 - Clear explanation of how code makes their robot act 4 CREATE 2 - Robot Design - How has the team exceeded?* ITERATE 1 - Robot Design*Team repeatedly tested their robot and code to identify areas for improvement and incorporated the findings into their current solution. 1 - Minimal evidence of testing their robot and code 2 - Partial evidence of testing their robot and code 3 - Clear evidence of testing their robot and code 4 ITERATE 1 - Robot Design - How has the team exceeded?* ITERATE 2 - Robot Design*Team repeatedly tested their robot and code to identify areas for improvement and incorporated the findings into their current solution. 1 - Minimal evidence their robot and code was improved 2 - Partial evidence their robot and code was improved 3 - Clear evidence their robot and code was improved 4 ITERATE 2 - Robot Design - How has the team exceeded?* COMMUNICATE 1 - Robot Design*Team’s explanation of the robot design process was effective and showed how all team members have been involved. 1 - Unclear explanation of robot design process 2 - Partially clear explanation of robot design process 3 - Clear explanation of robot design process 4 COMMUNICATE 1 - Robot Design - How has the team exceeded?* COMMUNICATE 2 - Robot Design*Team’s explanation of the robot design process was effective and showed how all team members have been involved. 1 - Minimal evidence that all team members were involved 2 - Partial evidence that all team members were involved 3 - Clear evidence that all team members were involved 4 COMMUNICATE 2 - Robot Design - How has the team exceeded?* Robot Design Feedback Comments - Great Job:Robot Design Feedback Comments - Think About: