Skip to content

Louisiana FIRST LEGO League

Our Future: Built Better Together

Home
About/Contact
LA Teams
LA Training
LA Tournaments
- 2024/25 LA State Championship
Resources
Volunteers
Sponsors
FLL Explore

Search for:

FIRST LEGO League Challenge State Championship Grading Rubric

February 27, 2021Uncategorizedsanchez

FIRST LEGO League Challenge State Championship Grading Rubric

For submission of judging rubrics for state tournament.

Team Number and Name*
Please select your team number and name from the drop down list.
Judging Pod*
Judging Session Feedback
This section should be used to record written feedback following the Innovation Project presentation and Robot Design explanation. The FIRST Core Values are the lens through which judges watch the team's presentations and evaluate their progress.
Core Values Feedback Comments - Great Job:
How did the team demonstrate teamwork, discovery, inclusion, innovation, impact, and fun in their work?
Core Values Feedback Comments - Think About:
How did the team demonstrate teamwork, discovery, inclusion, innovation, impact, and fun in their work?
Innovation Project Feedback Comments - Great Job:
How did the team identify and approach solving a problem connected to the season theme?
Innovation Project Feedback Comments - Think About:
How did the team identify and approach solving a problem connected to the season theme?
Robot Design Feedback Comments - Great Job:
How did the team approach solving robot game missions using building and coding?
Robot Design Feedback Comments - Think About:
How did the team approach solving robot game missions using building and coding?
Rising All Star
Select "Yes" if you believe this team is a team that the judges notice and expect great things from in the future.
Innovation Project
Teams should communicate to the judges their achievement in each of the following criteria. This rubric should be filled out during the Innovation Project presentation.

Judges are required to tick one box on each separate line to indicate the level the team has achieved. If the team EXCEEDS, a short comment in the exceeds column is required.

BEGINNING	DEVELOPING	ACCOMPLISHED	EXCEEDS
1	2	3	4
IDENTIFY 1 - Project* Team had a clearly defined problem that was well researched. 1 - Unclear definition of the problem 2 - Partially clear definition of the problem 3 - Clear definition of the problem 4 IDENTIFY 1 - Project - How has the team exceeded?* IDENTIFY 2 - Project/Core Values* Team had a clearly defined problem that was well researched. 1 - Minimal evidence of research 2 - Partial evidence of research from one or more sources 3 - Clear, detailed research from a variety of sources 4 IDENTIFY 2 - Project - How has the team exceeded?* DESIGN 1 - Project* Team worked together while creating a project plan and developing their ideas. 1 - Minimal evidence of an effective project plan 2 - Partial evidence of an effective project plan 3 - Clear evidence of an effective project plan 4 DESIGN 1 - Project - How has the team exceeded?* DESIGN 2 - Project/Core Values* Team worked together while creating a project plan and developing their ideas. 1 - Minimal evidence that development process involved all team members 2 - Partial evidence that development process involved all team members 3 - Clear evidence that development process involved all team members 4 DESIGN 2 - Project - How has the team exceeded?* CREATE 1 - Project/Core Values* Team developed an original idea or built on an existing one with a prototype model/drawing to represent their solution. 1 - Minimal explanation of innovation in solution 2 - Simple explanation of innovation in solution 3 - Detailed explanation of innovation in solution 4 CREATE 1 - Project - How has the team exceeded?* CREATE 2 - Project* Team developed an original idea or built on an existing one with a prototype model/drawing to represent their solution. 1 - Unclear model/drawing that represents the solution 2 - Simple model/drawing that represents the solution 3 - Detailed model/drawing that represents the solution 4 CREATE 2 - Project - How has the team exceeded?* ITERATE 1 - Project* Team shared their ideas, collected feedback and included improvements to their solution. 1 - Minimal sharing of their solution with others 2 - Solution shared with at least one person/group 3 - Solution shared with multiple people/groups 4 ITERATE 1 - Project - How has the team exceeded?* ITERATE 2 - Project* Team shared their ideas, collected feedback and included improvements in their solution. 1 - Minimal evidence of improvements based on feedback 2 - Partial evidence of improvements based on feedback 3 - Clear evidence of improvements based on feedback 4 ITERATE 2 - Project - How has the team exceeded?* COMMUNICATE 1 - Project/Core Values* Team shared an effective presentation of their solution, its impact on others, and celebrated their team's progress. 1 - Unclear explanation of the solution and its potential impact on others 2 - Partially clear explanation of solution and its potential impact on others 3 - Clear explanation of solution and its potential impact on others 4 COMMUNICATE 1 - Project - How has the team exceeded?* COMMUNICATE 2 - Project/Core Values* Team shared an effective presentation of their solution, its impact on others, and celebrated their team's progress. 1 - Presentation shows minimal pride or enthusiasm for their work 2 - Presentation shows partial pride or enthusiasm for their work 3 - Presentation clearly shows pride or enthusiasm for their work 4 COMMUNICATE 2 - Project - How has the team exceeded?*

Robot Design
Teams should communicate to the judges their achievement in each of the following criteria. This rubric should be filled out during the Robot Design explanation.

Judges are required to tick one box on each separate line to indicate the level the team has achieved. If the team EXCEEDS, a short comment in the exceeds column is required.

BEGINNING	DEVELOPING	ACCOMPLISHED	EXCEEDS
1	2	3	4
IDENTIFY 1 - Robot Design* Team determined which missions to attempt, explored building and coding resources, and sought guidance as needed. 1 - Minimal evidence of mission strategy 2 - Partial evidence of mission strategy 3 - Clear evidence of mission strategy 4 IDENTIFY 1 - Robot Design - How has the team exceeded?* IDENTIFY 2 - Robot Design/Core Values* Team determined which missions to attempt, explored building and coding resources, and sought guidance as needed. 1 - Minimal use of building or coding resources 2 - Some use of building or coding resources 3 - Clear use of building or coding resources to support their mission strategy 4 IDENTIFY 2 - Robot Design - How has the team exceeded?* DESIGN 1 - Robot Design/Core Values* Team members worked collaboratively on their designs and developed the building and coding skills needed. 1 - Minimal evidence that all team members contributed ideas 2 - Partial evidence that all team members contributed ideas 3 - Clear evidence that all team members contributed ideas 4 DESIGN 1 - Robot Design - How has the team exceeded?* DESIGN 2 - Robot Design* Team members worked collaboratively on their designs and developed the building and coding skills needed. 1 - Minimal evidence of building and coding skills in all team members 2 - Partial evidence of building and coding skills in all team members 3 - Clear evidence of building and coding skills in all team members 4 DESIGN 2 - Robot Design - How has the team exceeded?* CREATE 1 - Robot Design* Team developed original designs or improved on existing ones according to their mission strategy. 1 - Unclear explanation of attachments and their purpose 2 - Simple explanation of attachments and their purpose 3 - Clear explanation of innovative attachments and their purpose 4 CREATE 1 - Robot Design - How has the team exceeded?* CREATE 2 - Robot Design* Team developed original designs or improved on existing ones according to their mission strategy. 1 - Unclear explanation of code and/or sensor use 2 - Simple explanation of code and/or sensor use 3 - Clear explanation of innovative code and/or sensor use 4 CREATE 2 - Robot Design - How has the team exceeded?* ITERATE 1 - Robot Design* Team repeatedly tested their robot and code to identify areas for improvement and incorporated the findings into their current solution. 1 - Minimal evidence of testing their robot and code 2 - Partial evidence of testing their robot and code 3 - Clear evidence of repeated testing of their robot and code 4 ITERATE 1 - Robot Design - How has the team exceeded?* ITERATE 2 - Robot Design/Core Values* Team repeatedly tested their robot and code to identify areas for improvement and incorporated the findings into their current solution. 1 - Minimal evidence of improvements based on testing 2 - Partial evidence of improvements based on testing 3 - Clear evidence of improvements based on testing 4 ITERATE 2 - Robot Design - How has the team exceeded?* COMMUNICATE 1 - Robot Design/Core Values* Team effectively explained what they learned from the robot design process and celebrated their progress. 1 - Unclear explanation of process and lessons learned 2 - Simple explanation of process and lessons learned 3 - Detailed explanation of process and lessons learned 4 COMMUNICATE 1 - Robot Design - How has the team exceeded?* COMMUNICATE 2 - Robot Design/Core Values* Team effectively explained what they learned from the robot design process and celebrated their progress. 1 - Team shows minimal pride or enthusiasm for their work 2 - Team shows partial pride or enthusiasm for their work 3 - Team clearly shows pride or enthusiasm for their work 4 COMMUNICATE 2 - Robot Design - How has the team exceeded?*

Post navigation

← Championship Robot Match Video Submission LA FLL Referee Communication →

Proudly powered by WordPress